On May 21, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and gutted the venerable language from Conley v. Gibson that every civil procedure professor and student can recite almost by heart: that “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitled him to relief.” This Essay explains how Bell Atlantic did so and discusses some of its implications for pleading claims in the future.
93 Virginia Law Review: In Brief 135-143 (2007)
Dodson, Scott, "Pleading Standards After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly" (2007). Faculty Publications. 1041.