Home > Journals > WMLR > Vol. 68 (2026-2027) > Iss. 1 (2026)
William & Mary Law Review
Abstract
Part I of this Note will provide background on ICWA [Indian Child Welfare Act], from its history and purpose to its current structure and the Supreme Court’s recent interpretation in Haaland v. Brackeen. Part II will expand on ICWA’s practical implementation problems, contrasting well-resourced tribes with the struggles of smaller tribes, and illustrating how recent federal legislation has begun to acknowledge these capacity disparities without adequately addressing them. Part III will then propose a combination of federal reforms, including a tiered system for QEWs [qualified expert witnesses], as well as specialized ICWA dockets, to allow for more consistent, equitable implementation of ICWA. Ultimately, this Note concludes that a more capacity-sensitive ICWA will both strengthen tribal sovereignty and better serve the best interests of Native children.
This abstract has been taken from the author's introduction.