Authors

Austin Vining

No Means No: An Argument for the Expansion of Rape Shield Laws to Cases of Nonconsensual Pornography

Abstract

This Article considers the impact of a hypothetical nonconsensual pornography victim’s previous sexual history on potential legal remedies, both criminal and civil. Due to jury bias and the difficulty in proving standard elements of many claims, the research shows that such a victim would likely be unsuccessful in court. This Article then turns to two legal concepts from related fields—the incremental harm doctrine and rape shield laws—and considers what effect their application would have on the hypothetical victim’s case. Ultimately, the author presents an argument for the logical expansion of rape shield laws to cases of nonconsensual pornography.

Repository Citation

Austin Vining, No Means No: An Argument for the Expansion of Rape Shield Laws to Cases of Nonconsensual Pornography, 25 Wm. & Mary J. Race, Gender, & Soc. Just. 303 (2019), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol25/iss2/3