Home > Journals > WMBORJ > Vol. 25 (2016-2017) > Iss. 2 (2016)

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

The Flawed Reasoning Behind Johnson v. United States and a Solution: Why a Facts-Based Approach Should Have Been Used to Interpret the Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act

Repository Citation

Jake Albert, The Flawed Reasoning Behind Johnson v. United States and a Solution: Why a Facts-Based Approach Should Have Been Used to Interpret the Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 25 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 735 (2016), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol25/iss2/13

Download