Abstract
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this article lays bare the inconsistencies in the expected tasks of the Supreme Court. Where some roles of the Court have traditionally been treated as indivisible, examining those same roles separate from one another produces an incoherent view of the Court that is difficult to compromise.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1987
Publication Information
72 Iowa Law Review 1281-1299 (1987)
Repository Citation
Van Alstyne, William W., "Notes on a Bicentennial Constitution: Part II, Antinomial Choices and the Role of the Supreme Court" (1987). Faculty Publications. 740.
https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/740
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Legal History Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons